In the modern world, science and technology have taken full effect of events bringing a recognizable gap between scholar and theologians in matters concerning the faith. There have been attempts to harmonize the differences, but eventually, conservatives remain adamant to compromise on certain issue thereby widening the rift. Below are some valuable perspectives of Tempe liberal church.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also in their declaration that Christianity should be reliable and relevant touching the life of modern setup. It is a claim to allow modern intellect to contribute to the explanation of various mysteries where they are enough evidence to support a given claim. They allow social science and science of nature to give judgments on various issues and allow individual reasoning experience in support of ethical living.
There is also an emphasis on the issue of what is the truth. There are analogies and forms and even symbols set to portray certain truths. This has led to some forms and symbols been taken as the real truth and withdrawing focus from the original truth. This is not accepted by liberals who want changes in such beliefs and educates for changes that will lead to real truths, not signs and representations.
They also agree that the present disagreement about various judgments on faith truths is just the packaging but not lack of belief. This means that they could be talking about the same thing, but the constraints of language barrier or interpretation could be bringing the difficulties and controversies. They cite language as the base problem for disagreements but not the real belief.
Another notable thing is the issue of bible story accuracies and presentation of facts. They argue that the main thing is the teaching not how historically the stories may be aligned and facts presented. The emphasis is on what is taught in the gospels about Christ but not what format they are presented in or rather chronology in various books of the gospel.
Finally, they insist and emphasize that the true faith is the way of Christ. They discourage the adoration of doctrine about the savior but the actual focus on Christ himself. This is all in attempt to show that what is more important is the faith author not what is known about him.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also in their declaration that Christianity should be reliable and relevant touching the life of modern setup. It is a claim to allow modern intellect to contribute to the explanation of various mysteries where they are enough evidence to support a given claim. They allow social science and science of nature to give judgments on various issues and allow individual reasoning experience in support of ethical living.
There is also an emphasis on the issue of what is the truth. There are analogies and forms and even symbols set to portray certain truths. This has led to some forms and symbols been taken as the real truth and withdrawing focus from the original truth. This is not accepted by liberals who want changes in such beliefs and educates for changes that will lead to real truths, not signs and representations.
They also agree that the present disagreement about various judgments on faith truths is just the packaging but not lack of belief. This means that they could be talking about the same thing, but the constraints of language barrier or interpretation could be bringing the difficulties and controversies. They cite language as the base problem for disagreements but not the real belief.
Another notable thing is the issue of bible story accuracies and presentation of facts. They argue that the main thing is the teaching not how historically the stories may be aligned and facts presented. The emphasis is on what is taught in the gospels about Christ but not what format they are presented in or rather chronology in various books of the gospel.
Finally, they insist and emphasize that the true faith is the way of Christ. They discourage the adoration of doctrine about the savior but the actual focus on Christ himself. This is all in attempt to show that what is more important is the faith author not what is known about him.
About the Author:
Tempe liberal church invites you to pay a quick visit to its official website. Here is the web page you need at http://www.desertpalmucc.org.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire